Showing posts with label birth control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label birth control. Show all posts
Friday, November 2, 2012
We've Moved!
Exciting news! We've moved our blog to the Population Connection website at http://www.populationconnection.org. Be sure to read all of our updates at the brand new blog, Connecting Dots. See you there!
Labels:
birth control,
blog,
Connecting Dots,
contraception,
population
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
New Study: American Women Use Contraception for Great Reasons!
By Amy Phillips Bursch, Media Relations Manager
I’m not usually a big proponent of made-up holidays (International Talk Like a Pirate Day and National Donut Day excluded) but I can TOTALLY get behind this one: Tomorrow -- Sept. 26 -- is World Contraception Day! Yessss!
(Of course, some conservatives argue that women shouldn’t
have any life goals beyond being a wife and
mother, but I’d kindly suggest that they have at it if they'd like but let the rest of us
live our lives how we see fit, thank you very much.)
I’m not usually a big proponent of made-up holidays (International Talk Like a Pirate Day and National Donut Day excluded) but I can TOTALLY get behind this one: Tomorrow -- Sept. 26 -- is World Contraception Day! Yessss!
I'm a huge fan of family
planning. Contraception has allowed me to choose the direction of my life
rather than have only one option – motherhood. Given my lifelong disinterest in
parenthood, I’ve instead chosen to focus on being a wife, writer, employee,
volunteer and cool (I hope) auntie to seven great nieces and nephews.
I’m not alone. A
new study just out from the Guttmacher
Institute proves what I've suspected all along: American women use
contraception to -- wait for it – “better
achieve their life goals.” Whoa.
![]() |
| "We can wait to have a kid until we're ready? YES!" (Mathias Kunzli/Flickr) |
Tidbits from the study:
- 63% of women surveyed say contraception has helped them better take care of themselves and their families – including the kids they’ve already got.
- 56% say contraception has allowed them to support themselves financially.
- 51% say contraception has allowed them to complete their education. Those silly women thinking they need college degrees!
- 50% say contraception has allowed them to get or keep a job.
Among reasons women said they used contraception were
that they could not afford a baby (65%), they weren’t ready to have children
(63%), to have better control over their lives (60%) and wanting to wait until
their lives are more stable to add a baby to it (60%).
Those sound like really responsible reasons to me! And here I thought we were all using birth control to engage in wanton hedonism. Oh well.
Labels:
birth control,
contraception,
cool auntie,
donuts,
Guttmacher Institute,
motherhood,
pirates
Friday, August 3, 2012
Book Review: "Margaret Sanger: A Life of Passion"
By Alena Yarmosky, Outreach and Grassroots Fellow
Margaret Sanger was one cool chick. And I don’t mean cool in
the way that a pop song is cool – hip for .3 seconds before losing its grip to
the most recent summer jam. Margaret Sanger was cool in the unique sense of the
word reserved for people who have the courage to fight for a cause they believe
in, the grit to keep fighting, and the tenacity to succeed.
But Margaret Sanger’s cool factor is also based on something
infinitely more real and beautiful than any superficial melody. Margaret Sanger
was flawed.
Sanger’s view on reproductive rights and fight for universal
access to birth control (as well as her controversial teachings on safe sex,
child bearing and maternal health) make her a frequent target of those on the
religious right, even today. But recently those on the pro-choice, progressive
side of the aisle have also shied away from Sanger, allowing words like
“eugenicist” and “egotistical” to mar her story and deter from her
accomplishments.
Jean H. Baker’s biography “Margaret Sanger: A Life of
Passion” rejects the narrow-mindedness that has characterized many previous
Sanger biographies and instead focuses on Margaret Sanger’s life as a whole –
her flaws and missteps yes, but also her determination, intelligence, and
steadfast commitment to improving the lives of millions of women and their
families.
The sixth daughter of poor parents in Corning, N.Y., Margaret
Sanger watched her mother endure five more pregnancies before succumbing to
tuberculosis at a young age. After training as a nurse in what was to become
New York’s Lower East Side, Sanger helped young women deliver child after
child, many of whom could not afford to feed their growing families and begged
for the “secret” of pregnancy prevention.
Horrified by the injustice she saw, Sanger began in earnest the campaign
that would dictate the rest of her life: She wrote many books, gave countless
speeches all over the country, opened the first women’s health clinics in the
U.S., and ultimately spawned a birth control movement that would expand around
the world.
She was tough, she was dedicated, and perhaps
unsurprisingly, she was difficult to befriend. Too often Sanger engaged in
heated rivalry with her feminist counterparts, choosing personal notoriety over
potential collaboration. She was known
to bend the facts, ignore the contributions of her co-workers, and occasionally
pass off others’ stories as her own. She
left her children for long stretches of time, preferring a life of travel and
activism to the comforts and responsibilities of home.
Yet as ruthless as she was – and Baker makes
this point clear – Margaret Sanger was nothing if not effective. Born into a world where sex and pregnancy were
rarely discussed (much less sex for pleasure and pregnancy by choice) Sanger
lived to see the historic creation of the birth control pill and the
declaration of birth control as a constitutional right.
Margaret Sanger, then, was not the perfectly packaged hero
we read about in historical textbooks, nor the demon described by the right. In
“Margaret Sanger: A Life of Passion,” we have the unique opportunity to see the
activist as she really was: bold, ruthless, compassionate, flawed. And that, I
think, is pretty cool.
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
New Law Benefits Women, Planet
By Amy Phillips Bursch, Media Relations Manager
Happy Contraception Day! Today’s the day that most
insurance plans in the United States have to start covering birth control with
no co-pays under the Affordable
Care Act. As a woman who’s spent a fair amount of effort and money avoiding
motherhood, I couldn’t be more pleased.
Birth control can be very expensive, and laws that help increase access
are a great thing in my book.
But you don’t have to be a woman of a certain (reproductive)
age to benefit from expanded access to contraception. Contraception is good for
the women you care about, their families, their communities and the planet. And
who could possibly be against that? (Well, plenty of people, but I’ll touch on
that later.)
First up: Women. It’s not just the childless by choice
who benefit from contraception. Birth control allows women to wait to have babies
until they’re ready. When women can plan and appropriately space their
pregnancies, they and their babies are healthier. According to the reproductive
health gurus at the Guttmacher
Institute, “Women whose pregnancies are planned are more likely to receive
timely prenatal care. They are less likely to smoke or drink during pregnancy,
and more likely to breast-feed once their baby is born.” That’s good stuff.
![]() |
| Using these just got a lot more affordable. (outcast104/Flickr) |
The typical American woman only wants two children.
Contraception allows families to have the number of children they’re
comfortable raising – and give those children the best possible shot at
success. A child who’s received good health care and a great education is more
likely to grow up to be a productive member of society. That helps entire
nations succeed – and in our complex, interconnected global economy, we need as
much success as we can get.
So how does contraception help the planet? In one number: 26.8 billion.
That’s how many people the United Nations projects will be sharing Earth in
2100 if we don’t slow down population growth. Keep in mind that we have about
7.1 billion people on the planet right now. Picture nearly four times as many
people struggling to find (and afford) water, food and energy on a planet where
water, food and energy are already scarce in many areas. It’s a recipe for
disaster, but it’s an entirely preventable disaster if we take action.
By Guttmacher’s projections, 222 million
women in the developing world don’t have access to affordable and
appropriate contraception. Here in the United States, nearly half of all pregnancies
are unplanned. By expanding access both here (thanks, President Obama!) and
abroad (thanks, Melinda Gates, UNFPA, USAID and friends!), we can reduce
unintended births, slow down population growth and give the people of 2100 a
little more breathing room.
Sounds great, right? Not to everyone, unfortunately. The
tentacles of sexism are long and tightly wrapped around societies – including
ours. The collective right-wing freakout over the Affordable Care Act’s
contraception mandate is only the latest example. While many of us see women’s
equality as an inalienable right, powerful interests see it as a threat. That’s
why we can’t rest. We have to keep fighting the forces that would be happy to
see all women barefoot and pregnant and confined to making sandwiches in the
world’s kitchens.
The Affordable Care Act’s contraception coverage is a
great step in the right direction, and it will help women. And men. And
communities. And right-wingers, even though they claim otherwise. And our
planet. And the people of 2100. Here’s hoping the long fight for gender equity
is done by then.
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Family Planning Needed Here, Too!
By Amy Phillips Bursch, Media Relations Manager
I have a confession to make: I’m a bit of a Grist fangirl. I really like their straightforward
take on important environmental issues of our time.
![]() |
| Children are our future. Let's leave them a nice planet. (JD Hancock/Flickr) |
If so many young women … are
getting pregnant accidentally, then we as a country are doing something really
wrong — doing lots of things wrong, actually. Sex ed in our schools is too
often crappy
or nonexistent. Reliable birth control can be hard
to get ahold of and afford. Our whole culture is at once saturated
with sex and at the same time afraid of having of having honest conversations
about it. Add all that up and the result is that almost half of the
nation’s 6 million-plus pregnancies each year are unintended.
Imagine if it became normal for
young women in America, when they become sexually active, to start using a
long-acting form a contraception — an IUD (they’re making a comeback!) or a
patch or a ring or a shot, something you don’t have to think about every day —
until/unless they decide they want to have kids. (Yes, they should still use
condoms too.) Obama’s healthcare act will help make this more achievable; starting
this August, most insurance plans will be required to cover
the full cost of birth control. But it’ll take more than changing the
rules; we need to change the culture too.
CAN I GET AN AMEN?!!
Currently, there are 222 million women in
developing countries who want to delay or end childbearing but who don’t have
modern, appropriate contraception. It’s a HUGE problem – for the women, their
families, their nations, and the planet. But this Grist post makes an important
point – women right here, in our own communities and neighborhoods, also lack
access to contraception. That access is crucial if women are able to choose
their own futures.
(That’s one of the reasons that I, personally, was so
happy about Obama Administration’s rule
on contraception, but that’s a post for another time.)
One issue Grist didn’t mention: Those millions of (unintended)
American kids also have a big impact on our environment. Americans
produce more trash per person than anyone else on Earth. We
also use more energy per person than anyone else. We’re No. 1! We’re No. 1!
P.S. No, I don’t hate children. I have seven nieces and nephews under age 6 whom I adore. I just want the best
possible life for all kids for generations to come, and that won’t happen if we
run out of resources first.
Labels:
birth control,
contraception,
Grist,
IUD,
London Summit,
sex ed
Friday, June 22, 2012
Melinda Gates: Family Planning Advocate
By Alice Taylor, Population Connection Intern
NOTE: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is co-hosting an international family planning summit in London on July 11, World Population Day.
Whenever I’m in the mood to have my mind simultaneously
expanded and blown, I turn to TED Talks. For
people unfamiliar with the premise, they are videos of speeches delivered at
annual conferences centered on the basic theme of “ideas worth spreading.”
Ranging from humorous to heartbreaking, they tackle key issues that impact our
world today.
![]() |
| Melinda Gates talks about family planning. (Gates Foundation) |
It is unsurprising, then, that a recent talk focused on the undeniable
importance of putting family planning back on the global agenda. In a 25-minute speech, Melinda Gates makes a strong argument for why access to contraceptives -- an issue that has increasingly polarized politicians -- should, at its core, be noncontroversial. It is, in her words, about “giving women a
power to save their lives, save their children’s lives, and give their family
the best possible future.”
She offers some sobering statistics to underscore
her life-saving argument for contraceptives, namely that, out of women
experiencing unintended pregnancies, every year:
- 100,000 die in childbirth.
- Another 600,000 have their baby die within its first month of life.
And yet, she emphasizes that the discussion of family planning
is about more than the statistics. It’s about impacting change on the
individual level. Impacting change for people like Marianne, a Kenyan woman who
explained her desire for contraceptives by stating that, “I want to bring every
good thing to this child before I have another.”
And that simple sentiment,
borne out of a mother’s love, should not be controversial.
Friday, June 15, 2012
Talking Trash
By Amy Phillips Bursch, Media Relations Manager
So what does garbage have to do with human population growth? Plenty. The more people on the planet, the more garbage they
produce, and we’re already producing A LOT of garbage. One Saturday morning
trip to your local landfill will convince you of that fact.
According
to a new study out this month from the World Bank:
Currently, world cities generate
about 1.3 billion (tons) of solid waste per year. This volume is expected to
increase to 2.2 billion (tons) by 2025. Waste generation rates will more than
double over the next twenty years in lower income countries.
All this garbage isn’t just ugly.
According to the study, it’s also dangerous and expensive:
Locally, uncollected solid waste
contributes to flooding, air pollution, and public health impacts such as
respiratory ailments, diarrhea and dengue
fever. In lower income country cities, solid waste management is usually a
city’s single largest budgetary item.
Reducing, reusing and recycling helps reduce the volume,
of course. But unless we want our planet to look like this
is 2050 or so, one of the best ways we have to cut down on the waste we
produce is to slow population growth. How? It’s not that difficult – or even
that expensive.
In fact, for every investment of $100 million in
family planning, 3.6 million women are able to choose the size of their
families, and 2.1 million unintended pregnancies are avoided. It’s a relatively
tiny price tag for better lives – and a cleaner planet, too.
Then after slowing population growth, we just need to get
everyone to live like the
trash-free Johnson family of Mill Valley, Calif., and WALL-E will have to find a new
line of work.
Labels:
birth control,
climate change,
dengue fever,
garbage,
population growth,
women,
World Bank
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Texas Again Leads the Way?
By Brian Dixon
Texas once again shows the folly of allowing right wing ideology to substitute for good health policy. It has one of the highest rates of teen pregnancy in the country and the highest rate of repeat births to teenagers. It is also a state where it is very difficult for teenagers to get birth control.
According to a report in the Dallas Morning News, many doctors in the Dallas region refuse to prescribe contraceptives to teenagers without parental consent. Experts believe that Dallas policy requiring parental consent for birth control at ten school based health centers also applies to them – even though it doesn’t.
Not even young parents can get birth control confidentially – leading to the fact that Dallas leads the nation in repeat teenage pregnancy. Here is real evidence that parental consent rules are utterly counterproductive.
Sadly, a number of conservative organizations and lawmakers are pushing for federal legislation imposing this failed approach on the entire nation. When, and if, health reform comes to the full House and Senate, you can expect many amendments to limit access to reproductive health services for young people – and indeed for all Americans.
Those lawmakers need to hear from you that ideology can’t substitute for evidence when it comes to health policy and that young people need access to confidential family planning services.
Texas once again shows the folly of allowing right wing ideology to substitute for good health policy. It has one of the highest rates of teen pregnancy in the country and the highest rate of repeat births to teenagers. It is also a state where it is very difficult for teenagers to get birth control.
According to a report in the Dallas Morning News, many doctors in the Dallas region refuse to prescribe contraceptives to teenagers without parental consent. Experts believe that Dallas policy requiring parental consent for birth control at ten school based health centers also applies to them – even though it doesn’t.
Not even young parents can get birth control confidentially – leading to the fact that Dallas leads the nation in repeat teenage pregnancy. Here is real evidence that parental consent rules are utterly counterproductive.
Sadly, a number of conservative organizations and lawmakers are pushing for federal legislation imposing this failed approach on the entire nation. When, and if, health reform comes to the full House and Senate, you can expect many amendments to limit access to reproductive health services for young people – and indeed for all Americans.
Those lawmakers need to hear from you that ideology can’t substitute for evidence when it comes to health policy and that young people need access to confidential family planning services.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




